Body as an instrument of protest: feminist narratives in dance performances

Authors

  • Bugayets Nataliya H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University image/svg+xml Author
  • Ostroverkh Yelizaveta H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University image/svg+xml Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34142/27091805.2025.6.02.04

Keywords:

feminism, corporeality, dance performance, protest, female id

Abstract

Object. The article analyzes feminist dance performances in which corporeality becomes an instrument of political protest and social reflection. The study focuses on how the body, as an expressive and communicative medium, challenges dominant discourses about gender and power. Corporeality in feminist performance transforms the stage into a space of dialogue, resistance, and the rethinking of identity. Through movement and choreographic expression, dancers articulate social critique and reveal ways to challenge patriarchal norms through artistic means.
Purpose of the study. The study examines the phenomenon of feminist dance performances where corporeality functions as a tool of political protest and social criticism. The main goal is to identify how the body acts simultaneously as a means and a message in the construction of feminist discourse.
Methods & methodology. The research employs an interdisciplinary approach combining aesthetic, cultural, feminist, and art-historical analysis. Comparative and hermeneutic methods are used to interpret the works of Martha Graham, Pina Bausch, Simone Forti, Anna Halprin, and other choreographers. The methodological foundation includes concepts of performativity (J. Butler), body politics (S. Baines), and intersectional feminist analysis.
Results. The findings show that corporeality in feminist performance serves as a key instrument for articulating and critiquing patriarchal norms. The body functions as an active subject conveying emotional, traumatic, and collective experience. The main features of such performances include the deconstruction of gender stereotypes, emancipated movement, viewer involvement, and embodiment as a form of representing memory and trauma. The study also clarifies the impact of these practices on contemporary art and broader sociocultural processes, including the Ukrainian context.
Conclusions. Corporeality in feminist performance carries aesthetic, social, and political dimensions, becoming a medium of protest and self-exploration. Feminist practices expand the boundaries of choreography, affirming the body as an autonomous subject of cultural communication. Further research into these phenomena remains important in the context of ongoing social transformations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Bugayets Nataliya, H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University

    Candidate of Pedagogic sciences, professor of Design Department of Choreography

  • Ostroverkh Yelizaveta, H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University

    Student of the second (masters) level of higher education of the Faculty of Arts, Department of Choreography

References

Безклубенко, С.Д. (2008). Мистецтво: терміни та поняття (Т. 1: А – Л). Інститут культурології Академії мистецтв України. 239 с. ISBN 978-966-2241-06-8

Бойко, О.С. (2016). Танцювальні перфоманси як мистецьке явище. Вісник КНУКіМ. Серія «Мистецтвознавство», (35), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.31866/2410-1176.35.2016.158246

Гриценко, Я. (2023). Семіотичні та художньо-образні аспекти тілесності в сучасній хореографії. Актуальні питання гуманітарних наук, 61(1), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863/61-1-14

Єліна, А.С., & Єліна, В.В. (2024). Танцювальний перформанс – від витоків до сучасності. 18–29. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-555-6-2

Сафронова, А., Сафронова, О., & Сафронов, В. (2021). Прояви мистецтва арт-фемінізму у сучасній книжково-журнальній поліграфії. Мистецтвознавство, (60), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863/60-4-5

Сирбу, Г.В. (2025). Тандемна творчість у художній культурі другої половини ХХ – початку ХХІ століть [Дисертація]. Національна музична академія України імені П. І. Чайковського, Київ.

Щербак, Є. (2014). «Хореографічний фемінізм» по-українськи. Етнічна історія народів Європи, (43), 107–110. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/eine_2014_43_18.

Goldberg, R. (2011). Performance Art: From Futurism to the Present. Thames & Hudson. ISBN 978-0-500-20404-7

Jones, A. (1998). Body Art/Performing the Subject. University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 0-8166-2773-8

Martha Graham Dance Company. (1930). Lamentation. Martha Graham Resources. Retrieved from https://marthagraham.org/portfolio-items/lamentation-1930/

MoMA (The Museum of Modern Art). (n.d.). Simone Forti, Dance Constructions – Bios. https://surl.lt/zowkkh

Ross, J. (2007). Anna Halprin: Experience as Dance. University of California Press. 462 p.

Dadpour, R., & Shewly, H. J. (2025). Dancing in-between: interstitial feminist defiance in Iran’s public and digital spaces. Third World Quarterly, 46(10), 1229–1248. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2025.2541809

Tendenan, V. (2023). Dance and resistance: An embodiment of the body as a medium to fight violence against women. In Feminism – Corporeality, Materialism, and Beyond. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.109681

Foellmer, S. (2016). Choreography as a Medium of Protest. Dance Research Journal, 48(3), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0149767716000395

Desmond, J. C. (1993). Embodying Difference: Issues in Dance and Cultural Studies. Cultural Critique, 26, 33–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/1354455

Clum, J.M. (2016). [Review of the book Murder Most Queer: The Homicidal Homosexual in The American Theater, by Jordan Schildcrout]. Theatre Journal 68(1), 140-141. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/tj.2016.0021.

Published

03.11.2025

Issue

Section

Art Education

Categories

How to Cite

Bugayets, N., & Ostroverkh, Y. (2025). Body as an instrument of protest: feminist narratives in dance performances. Professional Art Education, 6(2), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.34142/27091805.2025.6.02.04

Most read articles by the same author(s)