Theoretical and methodological foundations of individualized education for students in creative specialties
based on the example of physical culture and sport
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34142/27091805.2024.5.02.12Keywords:
individualization, methodology, student, motivation, training, curricula, creativityAbstract
Based on the analysis of foreign literary sources, the article examines the theoretical and methodological principles of individualizing curricula for students in creative specialties (using physical education and sports as an example). The primary focus is on improving students’ learning outcomes and to develop their skills through the individualization of the learning process. The study emphasizes the effectiveness of using mixed methods, combining the qualitative and quantitative effects of learning methodologies with student success indicators. The main results indicate that personalized learning strategies significantly improve students’ engagement, motivation, and subsequent sports results, highlighting the strong correlation between individualized educational approaches and improved skill acquisition. This makes a significant contribution to the field of preserving students’ health, emphasizing the importance of personalized learning methods in the development of not only physical fitness, but also psychological well-being of future specialists in this field. The study suggests that the introduction of personalized learning approaches can lead to significant changes in physical education and sport programs, increase student readiness, and ultimately improve health outcomes across the population, as qualified educators can more effectively promote healthy lifestyles. This study is an important resource for educators seeking to optimize curricula to meet the diverse needs of students in physical education and sport. It is interesting to study the long-term effects of individualization on student academic and sport outcomes throughout the study period, which enriches the body of knowledge about the effectiveness of personalized learning methods in physical education and sport. Collaboration with professional practitioners in this field will increase the relevance and practical application of the results, ensuring that new pedagogical strategies are relevant to the diverse needs of students.
Downloads
References
Benford, M. (2023). A look at diversity through the lens of universal design for learning and differentiated instruction to better educate learners. Digital Commons @PVAMU. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/588396995.pdf
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Child Care & Early Education Research Connections. (2014). Response to intervention and other approaches for using ongoing assessment to guide individualized instruction in early education: A key topic resource list. Columbia University Libraries/Information Services. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/199236285.pdf
Flanagan, S. R., & Diller, L. (2013). Dr. George Deaver: The grandfather of rehabilitation medicine. PM&R, 5(4), 355–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.03.031
Jeong, Y. H., Healy, L. C., & McEwan, D. (2021). The application of goal setting theory to goal setting interventions in sport: A systematic review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14(1), 474–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2021.1901298
Krabak, B. J., Tenforde, A. S., Davis, I. S., Fredericson, M., Harrast, M. A., d’Hemecourt, P. A., Luke, A., et al. (2019). Youth distance running: Strategies for training and injury reduction. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 18(2), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1249/JSR.0000000000000564
Kung, T. H., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepaño, C., Madriaga, M., et al. (2023). Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digital Health, 2(4), e0000198. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198
Koohang, A., Nord, J. H., Ooi, K.-B., Tan, G. W.-H., Al-Emran, M., Aw, E. C.-X., Baabdullah, A. M., et al. (2023). Shaping the metaverse into reality: A holistic multidisciplinary understanding of opportunities, challenges, and avenues for future investigation. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 63(7), 735–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2023.2165197
Lushchyk, Yu. (2024). Navigating safe learning spaces in Ukrainian higher education under war conditions: Identifying challenges and finding solutions. Higher Education of Ukraine in the Context of Integration to European Educational Space. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8e7b4c1830cb932527acaa8b0bb6c0e09c77f06
Manore, M. M., Brown, K., Houtkooper, L., Jakicic, J. M., Peters, J. C., Smith Edge, M., Steiber, A., et al. (2014). Energy balance at a crossroads: Translating the science into action. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 114(7), 1113–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2014.03.012
Mason, E. (2020). American sign language interpreting for d/Deaf individuals with disabilities: A qualitative study and practical guide. Scholars Crossing. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/362657429.pdf
Martín-Rodríguez, A., Gostian-Ropotin, L. A., Beltrán-Velasco, A. I., Belando-Pedreño, N., Simón, J. A., López-Mora, C., Navarro-Jiménez, E., et al. (2024). Sporting mind: The interplay of physical activity and psychological health. Sports, 12(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12010037
Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B.-P. T. (2022). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 4221–4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w
Orr, C., & Sonnadara, R. (2019). Coaching by design: Exploring a new approach to faculty development in a competency-based medical education curriculum. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 10, 229–244. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S191470
Park, S., & Kim, Y.-G. (2022). A metaverse: Taxonomy, components, applications, and open challenges. IEEE Access, 10, 4209–4251. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3140175
Park, Y. (2011). A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(2), 78. https://doi.org/10.19173/IRRODL.V12I2.791
Patton-López, M., Manore, M. M., Branscum, A. J., Yu, M., & Wong, S. S. (2018). Changes in sport nutrition knowledge, attitudes/beliefs, and behaviors following a two-year sport nutrition education and life-skills intervention among high school soccer players. Nutrients, 10(11), 1636. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10111636
Tan, B., Tian, S., Wang, E., Xiao, L., Cao, K., Zheng, B., & Luo, L. (2023). Research on the development and testing methods of physical education and agility training equipment in universities. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1155490/full
Wang, C., Yuan, Y., & Ji, X. (2024). Effects of blended learning in physical education on university students’ exercise attitudes and basketball skills: A cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 24, 3170. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20469-x
Xie, B., Liu, H., Alghofaili, R., Zhang, Y., Jiang, Y., Lobo, F. D., Li, C., et al. (2021). A review on virtual reality skill training applications. Frontiers in Virtual Reality. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2021.645153
Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S.-Y., Starčič, A. I., Spector, M., Liu, J., et al. (2021). A review of artificial intelligence (AI) in education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
