Modern technologies in solving design ideas

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34142/27091805.2023.4.02.04

Keywords:

: design ideas, technologies, artificial intelligence, programs, 3D modeling, 3D printing

Abstract

Object. The article examines the role of modern technologies, which help design ideas to be implemented more effectively. The research aims to analyze and evaluate the use of artificial intelligence, virtual reality, 3D modeling, plug-ins and other advanced technologies in design, as well as to determine their impact on creativity, efficiency and sustainability of design solutions.

Methods & methodology. During the scientific research, the methods of literary and scientific review, comparison and synthesis, analysis of existing computer programs and technologies were used.

The scientific novelty of this article is revealed in an in-depth analysis of the impact of modern technologies on the processes of creation and development of design ideas through the use of artificial intelligence, virtual reality, 3D modeling, plugins and other advanced technologies, as well as in the determination of their impact on creativity, efficiency and sustainability of design solutions.

Results. It has been determined that modern technologies, including artificial intelligence, virtual reality, 3D modeling, plug-ins and other innovative tools, have a significant impact on graphic design and open up endless possibilities for it. Artificial intelligence helps to automate and optimize the processes of working with graphics, creating personalized content and analyzing graphic trends. Virtual reality can significantly expand the possibilities of visualization and interaction with graphic objects. 3D modeling and 3D printing allow you to create realistic prototypes and products. Plugins have been proven to expand the functionality of graphics programs and simplify routine tasks. However, the use of these technologies also requires designers to improve their professional skills. It is emphasized that it is important to maintain a balance between the use of technologies and the creativity of the designer himself.

Conclusions. The analysis of scientific articles and the contribution of scientists and practitioners in relation to the defined research problem was carried out. Programs and methods of creating a comfortable work process for the fastest and highest quality result are highlighted. Artificial intelligence, plug-ins, and neural networks are considered as auxiliary means. The work presents examples of such plugins for various programs and substantiates the principles of their use for the purpose of creating a design project and advertising one's own author's ideas. An attempt was made to analyze the prospects of using artificial intelligence in comparison with human capabilities within the framework of creating and improving the implementation of design projects, taking into account all the nuances and privileges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Viktoriia Katruha, H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University

    Graduate of higher education of the second (master’s) level, specialty 022 Design H.S.Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University
    Kharkiv, Ukraine

  • Anastasiia Tynynyka, H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University

    Senior teacher at the Department of Design in H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University 
    Kharkiv, Ukraine

References

Buchanan, B. G., Davis, R., Smith, R. G., & Feigenbaum, E. A. (2018). Expert systems: A perspective from computer science. In K. A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt, & A. M. Williams (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed., pp. 84–104). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480748.007

John McCarthy (2000). Concepts of Logical AI. У Logic-Based Artificial Intelligence (с. 37–56). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1567-8_2

Minsky, M. (dateless). 1956-1966 How Did It All Begin? - Issues Then and Now. У Lecture Notes in Computer Science (с. 437–438). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69912-5_32

Newell, A. (1970). Remarks on the Relationship Between Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Psychology. У Theoretical Approaches to Non-Numerical Problem Solving (с. 363–400). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-99976-5_14

Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (1995). A modern, agent-oriented approach to introductory artificial intelligence. ACM SIGART Bulletin, 6(2), 24–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/201977.201989

Simon, H. A. (1977). The Logic of Heuristic Decision Making. У Models of Discovery (с. 154–175). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9521-1_10

Simon, H. A. (1997). Machine Discovery. У Machine Discovery (с. 171–200). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2124-0_1

Turing, A. (1936). On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungs problem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, Received 28 May, 1936, 230–265. https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/Turing_Paper_1936.pdf

Глінська А. О. (2022). Застосування штучного інтелекту у проєктуванні web-сайтів. Інноватика в освіті, науці та бізнесі: виклики та можливості : матеріали IIІ Всеукраїнської конференції здобувачів вищої освіти і молодих учених, м. Київ, 17 листопада. Т. 1. С. 124-128. Innovatyka2022_V1_P124-128.pdf (knutd.edu.ua)

Макс Самко (2023). Як створюється штучний інтелект. Lemon School. Блог від 19 грудня. https://lemon.school/blog/yak-stvoryuyetsya-shtuchnyj-intelekt

Подлевський С., Тарко А. (2023). Вплив штучного інтелекту на дизайн інтерфейсів. Актуальнi питання гуманiтарних наук. Вип. 69, Том 2, С.103-107 https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863/69-2-16

Прищенко С. (2018). Рекламний дизайн: дослідження термінологічної бази. Вісник Національної академії керівних кадрів культури і мистецтв, (4), 318-323 https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.4.2018.153109

Published

03.11.2023

How to Cite

Katruha, . V., & Tynynyka, . A. (2023). Modern technologies in solving design ideas. Professional Art Education, 4(2), 30-38. https://doi.org/10.34142/27091805.2023.4.02.04